| 1 |
Am 2011-11-16 16:22, schrieb masterprometheus: |
| 2 |
> Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> I ask myself if I need the K-version at all, I don't want to |
| 7 |
>> overclock |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> No, if you're not going to overclock the K version is not needed. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
But as far as I read reviews online it is easy and rather safe to do so |
| 12 |
w/ the matching motherboard. So why not ... go for it. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
>> Did you also consider the newer i7-2700k? Maybe too expensive |
| 15 |
>> because it's so new. And I assume it's not that much faster. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> Although I only assume that, I have to research it ... |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> The 2700K is nothing different than the 2600K. The only plus is a 100 |
| 20 |
> MHz frequency boost. Not worth the extra $70 over a 2600/2600K. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Yep. So Intel noticed "wow, we get a few of them which run stable even |
| 23 |
at 100MHz more, let's sell them for some more money" ;-) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I will check prices here locally (Europe ...). |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Stefan |
Archives