Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Another hardware thread
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:02:51
Message-Id: CA+czFiCNNFA71j_Yx6QjwxcT-S=TKWMcc=JnqKhzwkrOgKkVmw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Another hardware thread by "Stefan G. Weichinger"
1 On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger <lists@×××××.at> wrote:
2 > Am 2011-11-16 16:22, schrieb masterprometheus:
3 >> The 2700K is nothing different than the 2600K. The only plus is a 100
4 >> MHz frequency boost. Not worth the extra $70 over a 2600/2600K.
5 >
6 > Yep. So Intel noticed "wow, we get a few of them which run stable even
7 > at 100MHz more, let's sell them for some more money"   ;-)
8
9 More likely, it's to avoid criticism for missing a regular incremental
10 release schedule. "This is as good as we got. Ship it."
11
12 It sounds like they're hitting the limits of their process again:
13
14 http://hardocp.com/article/2011/11/14/intel_core_i73960x_sandy_bridge_e_processor_review
15
16 --
17 :wq

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Another hardware thread "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@×××××.at>