| 1 |
Tero Grundström wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Holly Bostick wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>>I do think that this works because some ALSA modules really prefer to be |
| 6 |
>>modules under udev, but some flatly cannot-- for example, snd-seq-oss |
| 7 |
>>cannot be a module (despite what the Help says), but snd-seq (on which |
| 8 |
>>snd-seq-oss depends), can. So some parts of a complete ALSA install |
| 9 |
>>cannot be put in /etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6, where udev prefers |
| 10 |
>>to have them (because statically compiled modues are loaded before udev |
| 11 |
>>is running, so it can't create devices for them). |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>>So the first run loads the forced static compiles, and the second run |
| 14 |
>>loads the modules. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> FYI, |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I've had alsa compiled 100% static in kernel - worked perfectly. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I now have: |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> - alsa compiled 100% as modules |
| 24 |
> - nothing in /etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6 |
| 25 |
> - alsasound added only to bootlevel |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Works perfectly. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
Yes, of course you have, Tero-- you seem to be one of the fortunate |
| 30 |
few whose computer always works as advertised, under all conditions. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
You lucky dog, you ;-) . |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Holly |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives