| 1 |
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona |
| 2 |
<francesco.talamona@××××.eu> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less |
| 5 |
>> stable. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I got myself up to the latest, and I cannot install my 4 add-ons |
| 8 |
>> (xmarks, AdBlockPlus, Noscript, Stumble-upon) without it crashing. |
| 9 |
>> Seg fault sometimes. I've got ECC memory, and no reported problems, |
| 10 |
>> and it does not help to clear the profiles (rename ~/.mozilla) and |
| 11 |
>> re-emerge. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> Grrrrrr. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Ditto. Every time slower and less stable. And when it crashes makes the |
| 16 |
> X destop crash too, I use it with firebug and it's slow as molasses. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Looking forward to FF4, still not tried on Linux. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> greets |
| 21 |
> FT |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> Linux Version 2.6.35-gentoo-r7, Compiled #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Sep 17 |
| 25 |
> 21:01:33 CEST 2010 |
| 26 |
> Two 2.4GHz AMD Athlon 64 Processors, 4GB RAM, 9648.04 Bogomips Total |
| 27 |
> aemaeth |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Well, guess I'm lucky then. |
| 32 |
I used it since 2.x and never had any problems. Never needed other |
| 33 |
browser in Linux. Looking forward for 4.x, but still, 3.6.x is my |
| 34 |
personal choice. Don't like chromium, not enough extensions, can't |
| 35 |
stand Opera, Safari or Konqueror for the same reason. If flashblock, |
| 36 |
noscript and adblock were available at any browser I could try it, but |
| 37 |
still, I don't see it in a near future. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Daniel da Veiga |
Archives