1 |
Michael Mol wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 06:39:27 -0600 |
5 |
>>> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>>> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
8 |
>>>>> Am Samstag, 18. Februar 2012, 06:00:00 schrieb Dale: |
9 |
>>>> |
10 |
>>>>>> |
11 |
>>>>>> I don't really think they can unless they just cut power to all the |
12 |
>>>>>> computers. After all, the internet is supposed to be redundant |
13 |
>>>>>> right? If there is a few computers still running that have a |
14 |
>>>>>> connection, it is still working. Sort of anyway. |
15 |
>>>>>> |
16 |
>>>>>> Does make one wonder tho. They have been talking about having a |
17 |
>>>>>> internet "off switch" but I'm not sure it would be that easy. |
18 |
>>>>> |
19 |
>>>>> basically, yes. Take down the core routers and backbones and |
20 |
>>>>> everything falls apart. |
21 |
>>>>> |
22 |
>>>> |
23 |
>>>> But how long would it take to actually do this? |
24 |
>>>> |
25 |
>>>> Another thing, the Government, especially the military, uses the |
26 |
>>>> internet too. |
27 |
>>> |
28 |
>>> Not quite. They use the same internet *technology* you do, not |
29 |
>>> necessarily the same internet *devices*. |
30 |
>>> |
31 |
>>> |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> What about banks? Credit cards? Heck, even food stamp cards? Would |
35 |
>> phones work? I'm not just thinking about Vonage or Skype either. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Banks, credit cards, etc. mostly operate on leased lines (Think T1, |
38 |
> T2, T3...) and landlines (point-of-sale vending, though that's |
39 |
> changing. ATMs also operate on landlines, and I don't believe that's |
40 |
> changing.). |
41 |
> |
42 |
> You'd still have access to your money. You'd just have to go to a bank |
43 |
> branch or an ATM. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> This whole thread is full panicked reasoning. The biggest risk we face |
46 |
> is a scenario like Iran or Egypt's, where the government requires |
47 |
> controls on border routers. Most likely, they'd do it at the ISP |
48 |
> level, not at the core router level. That said, they could conceivably |
49 |
> demand core router operators acquiesce to their demands, but the worst |
50 |
> you're likely to see there is some network blocks' being dropped |
51 |
> offline. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> And it's not so easy to take the Internet down with injected BGP |
54 |
> routes any more, either; most network operators apply some sort of |
55 |
> filtering. |
56 |
> |
57 |
|
58 |
|
59 |
That has been my thinking all along. I don't think it would shut down |
60 |
quietly if it can be done at all. I was just curious as to what we |
61 |
would lose if it did go down. As to the cards, I know when I go to a |
62 |
store that is a Mom and Pop, they use dial-up. They may connect |
63 |
directly to the bank but it dials something. |
64 |
|
65 |
I mostly think two things. 1: The Government would have a very hard |
66 |
time shutting down the internet especially globally. 2: If it did and |
67 |
I was the Pres, I'd go find me a bunker. I can picture pitch forks, |
68 |
torches and some really pissed off people. |
69 |
|
70 |
Dale |
71 |
|
72 |
:-) :-) |
73 |
|
74 |
-- |
75 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
76 |
how you interpreted my words! |
77 |
|
78 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
79 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |