Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Somewhat OT: Any truth to this mess?
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 17:49:37
Message-Id: 4F3FE45C.3030401@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Somewhat OT: Any truth to this mess? by Michael Mol
1 Michael Mol wrote:
2 > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
3 >> Alan McKinnon wrote:
4 >>> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 06:39:27 -0600
5 >>> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
6 >>>
7 >>>> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
8 >>>>> Am Samstag, 18. Februar 2012, 06:00:00 schrieb Dale:
9 >>>>
10 >>>>>>
11 >>>>>> I don't really think they can unless they just cut power to all the
12 >>>>>> computers. After all, the internet is supposed to be redundant
13 >>>>>> right? If there is a few computers still running that have a
14 >>>>>> connection, it is still working. Sort of anyway.
15 >>>>>>
16 >>>>>> Does make one wonder tho. They have been talking about having a
17 >>>>>> internet "off switch" but I'm not sure it would be that easy.
18 >>>>>
19 >>>>> basically, yes. Take down the core routers and backbones and
20 >>>>> everything falls apart.
21 >>>>>
22 >>>>
23 >>>> But how long would it take to actually do this?
24 >>>>
25 >>>> Another thing, the Government, especially the military, uses the
26 >>>> internet too.
27 >>>
28 >>> Not quite. They use the same internet *technology* you do, not
29 >>> necessarily the same internet *devices*.
30 >>>
31 >>>
32 >>
33 >>
34 >> What about banks? Credit cards? Heck, even food stamp cards? Would
35 >> phones work? I'm not just thinking about Vonage or Skype either.
36 >
37 > Banks, credit cards, etc. mostly operate on leased lines (Think T1,
38 > T2, T3...) and landlines (point-of-sale vending, though that's
39 > changing. ATMs also operate on landlines, and I don't believe that's
40 > changing.).
41 >
42 > You'd still have access to your money. You'd just have to go to a bank
43 > branch or an ATM.
44 >
45 > This whole thread is full panicked reasoning. The biggest risk we face
46 > is a scenario like Iran or Egypt's, where the government requires
47 > controls on border routers. Most likely, they'd do it at the ISP
48 > level, not at the core router level. That said, they could conceivably
49 > demand core router operators acquiesce to their demands, but the worst
50 > you're likely to see there is some network blocks' being dropped
51 > offline.
52 >
53 > And it's not so easy to take the Internet down with injected BGP
54 > routes any more, either; most network operators apply some sort of
55 > filtering.
56 >
57
58
59 That has been my thinking all along. I don't think it would shut down
60 quietly if it can be done at all. I was just curious as to what we
61 would lose if it did go down. As to the cards, I know when I go to a
62 store that is a Mom and Pop, they use dial-up. They may connect
63 directly to the bank but it dials something.
64
65 I mostly think two things. 1: The Government would have a very hard
66 time shutting down the internet especially globally. 2: If it did and
67 I was the Pres, I'd go find me a bunker. I can picture pitch forks,
68 torches and some really pissed off people.
69
70 Dale
71
72 :-) :-)
73
74 --
75 I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
76 how you interpreted my words!
77
78 Miss the compile output? Hint:
79 EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"