1 |
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 06:39:27 -0600 |
4 |
>> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
7 |
>>>> Am Samstag, 18. Februar 2012, 06:00:00 schrieb Dale: |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>>>> |
10 |
>>>>> I don't really think they can unless they just cut power to all the |
11 |
>>>>> computers. After all, the internet is supposed to be redundant |
12 |
>>>>> right? If there is a few computers still running that have a |
13 |
>>>>> connection, it is still working. Sort of anyway. |
14 |
>>>>> |
15 |
>>>>> Does make one wonder tho. They have been talking about having a |
16 |
>>>>> internet "off switch" but I'm not sure it would be that easy. |
17 |
>>>> |
18 |
>>>> basically, yes. Take down the core routers and backbones and |
19 |
>>>> everything falls apart. |
20 |
>>>> |
21 |
>>> |
22 |
>>> But how long would it take to actually do this? |
23 |
>>> |
24 |
>>> Another thing, the Government, especially the military, uses the |
25 |
>>> internet too. |
26 |
>> |
27 |
>> Not quite. They use the same internet *technology* you do, not |
28 |
>> necessarily the same internet *devices*. |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |
33 |
> What about banks? Credit cards? Heck, even food stamp cards? Would |
34 |
> phones work? I'm not just thinking about Vonage or Skype either. |
35 |
|
36 |
Banks, credit cards, etc. mostly operate on leased lines (Think T1, |
37 |
T2, T3...) and landlines (point-of-sale vending, though that's |
38 |
changing. ATMs also operate on landlines, and I don't believe that's |
39 |
changing.). |
40 |
|
41 |
You'd still have access to your money. You'd just have to go to a bank |
42 |
branch or an ATM. |
43 |
|
44 |
This whole thread is full panicked reasoning. The biggest risk we face |
45 |
is a scenario like Iran or Egypt's, where the government requires |
46 |
controls on border routers. Most likely, they'd do it at the ISP |
47 |
level, not at the core router level. That said, they could conceivably |
48 |
demand core router operators acquiesce to their demands, but the worst |
49 |
you're likely to see there is some network blocks' being dropped |
50 |
offline. |
51 |
|
52 |
And it's not so easy to take the Internet down with injected BGP |
53 |
routes any more, either; most network operators apply some sort of |
54 |
filtering. |
55 |
|
56 |
-- |
57 |
:wq |