| 1 |
>>> David, you mentioned in the bug that you couldn't get the patch to |
| 2 |
>>> work clean. I thought you got it working before when you posted the |
| 3 |
>>> patched Typemap for me to download. Did it work then but not now? |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
>>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Ah, I didn't know you had this already mostly figured out in a bug. |
| 8 |
>> Full disclosure requested -- from the very beginning! :D |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> After taking a quick peek: do those ebuilds succeed in installing |
| 11 |
>> something? Since they don't follow CPAN conventions (esp. wrt naming) |
| 12 |
>> I'm not sure what perl-module.eclass actually does for their |
| 13 |
>> src_compile, src_install and other steps. Also, the "->" used in SRC |
| 14 |
>> might have interesting side-effects to paths, as the tarball name no |
| 15 |
>> longer matches its content directory's name. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> -- |
| 18 |
>> Arttu V. -- Running Gentoo is like running with scissors |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
> I don't think I will use the software, I was just helping to put the |
| 22 |
> pieces together, Grant has been testing it as we move forward. Once we |
| 23 |
> get the pieces together and if it will work as intended I think we |
| 24 |
> could contact upstream to help with a more sensible approach to |
| 25 |
> packaging the patch for the stock SOAP-WSDL, so updating will be |
| 26 |
> easier to maintain. |
| 27 |
> Just my 2c :) |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> -- |
| 31 |
> David Abbott (dabbott) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
You think Google will change the way it packages the SOAP-WSDL patch |
| 34 |
if we request it? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
- Grant |
Archives