| 1 |
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Arttu V. <arttuv69@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 7/2/10, Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> David, you mentioned in the bug that you couldn't get the patch to |
| 4 |
>> work clean. I thought you got it working before when you posted the |
| 5 |
>> patched Typemap for me to download. Did it work then but not now? |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Ah, I didn't know you had this already mostly figured out in a bug. |
| 10 |
> Full disclosure requested -- from the very beginning! :D |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> After taking a quick peek: do those ebuilds succeed in installing |
| 13 |
> something? Since they don't follow CPAN conventions (esp. wrt naming) |
| 14 |
> I'm not sure what perl-module.eclass actually does for their |
| 15 |
> src_compile, src_install and other steps. Also, the "->" used in SRC |
| 16 |
> might have interesting side-effects to paths, as the tarball name no |
| 17 |
> longer matches its content directory's name. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> -- |
| 20 |
> Arttu V. -- Running Gentoo is like running with scissors |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
I don't think I will use the software, I was just helping to put the |
| 24 |
pieces together, Grant has been testing it as we move forward. Once we |
| 25 |
get the pieces together and if it will work as intended I think we |
| 26 |
could contact upstream to help with a more sensible approach to |
| 27 |
packaging the patch for the stock SOAP-WSDL, so updating will be |
| 28 |
easier to maintain. |
| 29 |
Just my 2c :) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
David Abbott (dabbott) |
Archives