1 |
R0b0t1 wrote: |
2 |
> Hello List, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> This isn't normal. Is it due to the new process model? I think I read |
5 |
> that now they emulate chrome, which possibly means both browsers are |
6 |
> unsuitable for use. Firefox will require its threads be OOM killed if |
7 |
> not closely monitored. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> If it can be fixed - can anyone explain? |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Cheers, |
12 |
> R0b0t1 |
13 |
> |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
Have you checked to see what in Firefox is using that memory? |
18 |
about:memory Then click on Verbose and then Measure. In the past, I |
19 |
have found websites that are just awful at loading everything Firefox |
20 |
has and usually for no good reason. It's one reason I use adblock, with |
21 |
some custom blocking not related to ads, and script blocking tools as |
22 |
well. I can give those memory hungry things a toss in the trash before |
23 |
they even load. |
24 |
|
25 |
Maybe that will help. Of course, it could be just Firefox being |
26 |
Firefox. I have seen mine use 2GBs in the past but never that much. :/ |
27 |
|
28 |
Hope that leads to a clue. |
29 |
|
30 |
Dale |
31 |
|
32 |
:-) :-) |