| 1 |
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:45:40 +0000 |
| 2 |
Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> No, and nor should they. Each filesystem implementing its own |
| 5 |
> encryption layer would be a nightmare. A separate encryption layer on |
| 6 |
> which you create any filesystem you like is much more sensible. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
It's true for Linux and any other kernel designed to work with many |
| 9 |
implementations of "the same" thing (FS in this case). MS doesn't care |
| 10 |
about many file systems, but just their own, therefore they don't |
| 11 |
face this problem. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Best regards, |
| 15 |
Daniel |
Archives