1 |
On Saturday 13 February 2010 19:51:05 Alan Mackenzie wrote: |
2 |
> Thanks! In the end, I just used the gcc I had on the system anyway; it |
3 |
> wasn't broken. I first did 'emerge -e gcc', which took an hour, then did |
4 |
> 'emerge -e world', which took ~2 hours 30 mins. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I was being a bit paranoid. The reason I "gave up" on the installation |
7 |
> CD was I failed to find out how to start my LVM2 voluble logics, or |
8 |
> whatever they're called. |
9 |
|
10 |
Oh yes, I forgot about that. I have old LiveCDs around too that don't support |
11 |
LVM. It can get bloody annoying when you forget and use it anyway. These days |
12 |
I use RIPLinux on a small spare USB stick as my rescue system |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
> I'm now back on track, setting up my PC. Thanks! |
16 |
> |
17 |
> > The paranoid might want to emerge gcc itself on it's own first so that |
18 |
> > rebuilding world is done with the same gcc version as what it will |
19 |
> > become (gcc is not built first when you rebuild world, all sort of |
20 |
> > toolchain tools and parsers are earlier in the list). Personally, I |
21 |
> > don't do that - there is an actual chance that using an old compiler to |
22 |
> > build a new compiler may lead to incompatibility issues, but the risk |
23 |
> > is extremely small and rare, and it's never bitten me. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> There was that apocryphal tale of the origianl Unix hacker who hardwired |
26 |
> a backdoor login into the system, and hacked cc to keep inserting the |
27 |
> backdoor each time the system was built, and to keep this hack in cc each |
28 |
> time cc was compiled. Whew! |
29 |
|
30 |
That's not a myth either :-) |
31 |
|
32 |
There was a story on /. about that very thing just the other day! |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |