| 1 |
Am 14.12.2012 18:56, schrieb Mark Knecht: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I'm updating a system that's probably gone 2 or 3 months since its |
| 4 |
>> last update. |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> ==================================================================== |
| 7 |
>> !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel" has unmet requirements. |
| 8 |
>> - x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.20.13::gentoo USE="dri -glamor -sna -udev -uxa -xvmc" |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied: |
| 11 |
>> any-of ( glamor sna uxa ) |
| 12 |
>> ==================================================================== |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> This is the first time I've run into these options. A bit of Google |
| 15 |
>> detective work turned up some articles... |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=intel_glamor_first&num=1 |
| 18 |
>> http://ickle.wordpress.com/2012/06/05/an-evening-with-glamor/ |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> ...which give the impression that SNA is the fastest option overall. |
| 21 |
>> The phoronix article also mentioned some instability issues with glamor. |
| 22 |
>> I'll probably be going with SNA. Does anybody else have any experience |
| 23 |
>> and/or opinions? |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> -- |
| 26 |
>> Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
| 27 |
>> I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> I have no idea about performance but I've got udev and sna enabled at this time. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
+1 |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
> gandalf ~ # emerge -pv xf86-video-intel |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> Calculating dependencies... done! |
| 40 |
> [ebuild R ] x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.20.13 USE="dri sna |
| 41 |
> udev -glamor -uxa -xvmc" 0 kB |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB |
| 44 |
> gandalf ~ # |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> Be forewarned, or please report back if you can, but in my case on the |
| 47 |
> two Intel machines I have (one local, one my 84 year old dad uses) X11 |
| 48 |
> stopped displaying anything after this update. As a quick fix I |
| 49 |
> removed the xorg.conf file completely to get a desktop back. This was |
| 50 |
> a couple of weeks ago. Removing xorg.conf worked on both machines and |
| 51 |
> I haven't gone back to figure out what happened and how to best |
| 52 |
> address it. |
| 53 |
> |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
If you don't miss features I say good riddance to xorg.conf. |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
Regards, |
| 58 |
Florian Philipp |
Archives