1 |
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 02:52:05 -0500, Dale wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > No, the discussion is about the name of the file in package.unmask. if |
4 |
> > that is a file there is no issue. The problem is that portage just |
5 |
> > picks a file from that directory, it should either have its own file |
6 |
> > in there or add the entries to a file named after the package. |
7 |
|
8 |
> I agree but it doesn't do that. |
9 |
|
10 |
Well, we wouldn't be complaining about it not doing something if it did |
11 |
it :) |
12 |
|
13 |
> Of course, as I described, having many |
14 |
> files makes it difficult to find what file contains what too. |
15 |
|
16 |
Not if the files are sensibly organised. The current implementation |
17 |
messes up that organisation. |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Neil Bothwick |
22 |
|
23 |
The horizon of many people is a circle with a radius of zero. They call |
24 |
this their point of view. |
25 |
-- Albert Einstein |