1 |
Mick wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday, 26 November 2019 15:16:24 GMT Dale wrote: |
3 |
>> Adam Carter wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 1:53 AM Ralph Seichter <abbot@×××××××××××.net |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> <mailto:abbot@×××××××××××.net>> wrote: |
7 |
>>> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/2019-November/001712 |
8 |
>>> .html |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> This does not come as a surprise, of course, but I consider it a good |
11 |
>>> point in time to pause and ask oneself what each individual can do to |
12 |
>>> move further towards IPv6. The end is neigh(ish). |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> Turning on ipv6 has been on my agenda for a while, but I will need to |
15 |
>>> setup a firewall. Currently i have a single ipv4 NAT box with some |
16 |
>>> port forwards. However, when i enable v6, all my internal hosts become |
17 |
>>> directly routable from the Internet via the /56 my ISP assigns me. |
18 |
>> I have a question about this. I've read about this for ages and sort of |
19 |
>> get the idea, running out of numbers basically. There's two questions |
20 |
>> that I can't answer tho. I have a old Linksys router, the old blue |
21 |
>> thing that is so common. Would I have to buy a new router? |
22 |
> Yes. You will need a router which has an IPv6 network stack on it, besides |
23 |
> the legacy IPv4 network stack, to be able to route IPv6 addresses directly |
24 |
> from your LAN. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Depending on how useful your ISP is, they may offer IPv6 tunneling over IPv4. |
27 |
> You connect to their gateway/proxy over IPv4 as you do now with your existing |
28 |
> router, but route through the IPv4 tunnel your IPv6 connections. Their |
29 |
> gateway will act as an endpoint for your IPv4 tunnel and forward your IPv6 |
30 |
> packets to the IPv6 interwebs. It is likely they will only do this after they |
31 |
> have a good sniff at them, but in this age of universal surveillance such an |
32 |
> activity won't be something surprising. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
>> I also have |
36 |
>> a older DSL modem, it's a old Westell black box. Would this require a |
37 |
>> newer modem as well? |
38 |
> If this is an ADSL modem only (i.e. no PPP negotiation or NAT'ing - a.k.a. |
39 |
> 'Fully Bridged Mode') then it is using ATM encapsulation. IPv4 or IPv6 |
40 |
> packets from your LAN will be encapsulated into ATM frames by your modem and |
41 |
> sent to the telephone exchange over copper wires. There is no need to change |
42 |
> your modem in this case. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> However, if your modem is operating in a 'Half-Bridged mode' then it is |
45 |
> essentially performing IP masquerading plus ATM encapsulation. In this case |
46 |
> it is routing ethernet - it will have to be able to manage IPv6 packets. An |
47 |
> old (legacy) router will only have IPv4 stack and the previous comments apply. |
48 |
> You could always set the modem in fully bridged mode, after you connect to its |
49 |
> management interface, and thereafter use your router to perform PPP |
50 |
> authentication with your ISP. In fully bridged mode you won't need to change |
51 |
> your modem. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> |
54 |
>> I'm thinking those boxes would have to have |
55 |
>> software at least that would support the newer addresses but nothing |
56 |
>> I've read really answers those questions. I don't know if they even |
57 |
>> update software on those old things. |
58 |
>> |
59 |
>> Thoughts?? |
60 |
>> |
61 |
>> Dale |
62 |
>> |
63 |
>> :-) :-) |
64 |
> You need to google for alternative linux based firmware/software for your |
65 |
> router and modem make and model. However, if these are really old devices, |
66 |
> then their chipsets and RAM may not be adequate to allow them to run dual |
67 |
> network stacks without grinding to a halt. If the OEMs never provided IPv6 |
68 |
> capability, for these devices it could well be the case the hardware is not |
69 |
> capable of carrying the processing load. |
70 |
|
71 |
|
72 |
I enter my username/password on the modem so I'm pretty sure it is |
73 |
processing the packets and such. There is no mention of anything IPv4 |
74 |
or v6. I'd suspect it is v4 only, since it works it has to support v4. |
75 |
lol So, old modem may have to be bricked at some point. I do have a |
76 |
newer gray modem that came with the DSL kit. I stopped using it because |
77 |
it got so warm. The old black box one runs cool and it has more vent |
78 |
holes. I may have to check and see if the gray one supports v6 but it |
79 |
is fairly old too. It's at least 10 years old. |
80 |
|
81 |
My router also makes no mention of IPv4 or v6. I suspect it is in the |
82 |
same boat as the modem, it doesn't support it and doesn't have the |
83 |
option to either. I did go to the Linksys website and look for a |
84 |
firmware upgrade, nothing available, not even a old one. |
85 |
|
86 |
I did some searching for routers with ipv6 support. I'm not finding a |
87 |
lot. Is this something I need to worry about yet? I mean, is there a |
88 |
lot of IPv6 equipment even available right now? |
89 |
|
90 |
Thanks to all for the info. Both had good info that helped. Water |
91 |
isn't quite as muddy as it was. |
92 |
|
93 |
Dale |
94 |
|
95 |
:-) :-) |