| 1 |
On Sat, 06 May 2017 19:22:50 -0400, allan gottlieb wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I received many helpful replies, each of which recommend a tool other |
| 4 |
> than sane. Is the point that sane can't use the document feeder or just |
| 5 |
> that you prefer (or simply have used) other tools. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
SANE is mainly intended as the infrastructure for scanning. The other |
| 8 |
tools, with the exception if IScan, all use SANE but provide a more |
| 9 |
functional interface. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
For example, gscan2pdf that I use supports both single and double sided |
| 12 |
ADF and can also scan a bunch of pages twice if your scanner only does |
| 13 |
single sided. It provides a number of post scan processing tools and can |
| 14 |
save in a variety of formats. But at its heart it uses libsane. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
If it's tourist season, why can't we shoot them? |
Archives