| 1 |
On Sun, May 07 2017, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Sat, 06 May 2017 19:22:50 -0400, allan gottlieb wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> I received many helpful replies, each of which recommend a tool other |
| 6 |
>> than sane. Is the point that sane can't use the document feeder or just |
| 7 |
>> that you prefer (or simply have used) other tools. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> SANE is mainly intended as the infrastructure for scanning. The other |
| 10 |
> tools, with the exception if IScan, all use SANE but provide a more |
| 11 |
> functional interface. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> For example, gscan2pdf that I use supports both single and double sided |
| 14 |
> ADF and can also scan a bunch of pages twice if your scanner only does |
| 15 |
> single sided. It provides a number of post scan processing tools and can |
| 16 |
> save in a variety of formats. But at its heart it uses libsane. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Good to know. Thanks. |
| 19 |
allan |
Archives