Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-systemd-only deprecation
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 18:09:12
Message-Id: CADPrc81dmKtxD1MY2VwYq9NPMBz_dBUTUv47=Aj2GhP8FavBnA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-systemd-only deprecation by Stroller
1 On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Stroller
2 <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
3 >
4 > On 31 July 2013, at 18:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
5 >> ...
6 >> Whinging about systemd binaries being installed is valid, but whinging
7 >> about some data files is not. Anyone who does is letting their OCD show
8 >> in ways they really should be keeping private.
9 >
10 > Hmmmn, it's a bit freaking weird - if I'm understanding correctly some of the statements made here about systemd - that there will be files installed to /etc/init.d/ that don't actually do anything.
11
12 If you use systemd, all the files installed in /etc/init.d (except
13 functions.sh) don't actually do nothing. If you use OpenRC, all the
14 files installed in /urs/lib/systemd/system don't actually do nothing.
15
16 Whichever you use (OpenRC or systemd), you will have files in both
17 locations (actually, a bunch of them), and therefore one of those
18 locations will have files that don't actually do nothing.
19
20 Unless you use INSTALL_MASK, which is of course what this is all about.
21
22 Regards.
23 --
24 Canek Peláez Valdés
25 Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
26 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-systemd-only deprecation Bruce Hill <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-systemd-only deprecation Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk>