Archives
Archives
| From: | Etaoin Shrdlu <shrdlu@×××××××××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Size of portage tree | ||
| Date: | Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:50:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200509281552.17882.shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Size of portage tree by glumtail |
||
| 1 | On Wednesday 28 September 2005 14:43, glumtail wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > You can alway rm /usr/portage/distfiles/ |
| 4 | > Those files can be downloaded again when emerge. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Also, the block size of the file system in which /usr/portage lives can |
| 7 | make a big difference. |
| 8 | Try a clean /usr/portage on an ext2/3 filesystem vs. a /usr/portage on |
| 9 | reiserfs and you'll see what I mean. |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-user] Re: Size of portage tree | Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Size of portage tree | Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@×××.de> |