From: | Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@×××××.fr> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Cc: | Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@×××××.fr> | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Beta test Gentoo with mdev instead of udev; version 3 | ||
Date: | Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:33:43 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120103123209.GB2410@nicolas-desktop | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Beta test Gentoo with mdev instead of udev; version 3 by Pandu Poluan |
1 | The 03/01/12, Pandu Poluan wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > (Come to think of it, has *any* distro ever attempted this... |
4 | > 'unconventional of going udev-free?) |
5 | |
6 | mdev is not an udev replacement. It's a very minimalist udev designed |
7 | for embedded systems and initramfs. These days, a full-featured system |
8 | require a dynamic /dev and AFAIK the only existing and up-to-date tool |
9 | for this job is udev. |
10 | |
11 | I don't think any other distro attempted to get free of udev as it means |
12 | coming back to 10 years ago, at least. |
13 | |
14 | -- |
15 | Nicolas Sebrecht |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Beta test Gentoo with mdev instead of udev; version 3 | Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> |
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Beta test Gentoo with mdev instead of udev; version 3 | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |