| 1 |
On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 09 May 2010, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Sunday 09 May 2010, walt wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > This looks to me like a major portage screwup. I see that on my |
| 6 |
> > > > ~amd64 machine I have both versions of libpng, but the 1.2.43-r1 |
| 7 |
> > > > doesn't install a pkg-config file because 1.4.2 installs one with |
| 8 |
> > > > the same name, and just as bad, version 1.2.43-r1 removed the |
| 9 |
> > > > libpng12 header files. |
| 10 |
> > > > |
| 11 |
> > > > For now, I'd suggest just going back to to 1.2.43 if you can -- maybe |
| 12 |
> > > > mask |
| 13 |
> > > > |
| 14 |
> > > > >1.2.43 in package.mask? |
| 15 |
> > > > |
| 16 |
> > > > Meanwhile I'm trying to fix firefox so I can read the bug report |
| 17 |
> > > > mentioned by Andras. |
| 18 |
> > > |
| 19 |
> > > well I'm getting into a .la hell... |
| 20 |
> > > you need to rebuild packages which are themselves not invalid and |
| 21 |
> > > therefore can't be found by revdep-rebuild... |
| 22 |
> > > |
| 23 |
> > > searching with "grep png12 `find /usr/lib64/ -name '*.la'`" lists all |
| 24 |
> > > .la files with a bad png version, rebuilding those will fix the |
| 25 |
> > > system. after that all packages found by revdep-rebuild can be |
| 26 |
> > > emerged. |
| 27 |
> > > |
| 28 |
> > > Rudmer |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> > run la fixer |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> ah, yes I knew there was something easier 8-) |
| 33 |
> well running `lafilefixer --justfixit` did not find anything so I got them |
| 34 |
> all |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> thanks! |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Rudmer |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
sadly, it does not get them all. |
| 41 |
The only save way: |
| 42 |
grep -R for png12 and remerge all packages whose files pop up. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
For example revdep-rebuilt failed to rebuild pygtk - because of glade. But it |
| 45 |
never tried to rebuild glade... |
Archives