| 1 |
On Sunday 09 May 2010, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sunday 09 May 2010, walt wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > This looks to me like a major portage screwup. I see that on my ~amd64 |
| 5 |
> > > machine I have both versions of libpng, but the 1.2.43-r1 doesn't |
| 6 |
> > > install a pkg-config file because 1.4.2 installs one with the same |
| 7 |
> > > name, and just as bad, version 1.2.43-r1 removed the libpng12 header |
| 8 |
> > > files. |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > For now, I'd suggest just going back to to 1.2.43 if you can -- maybe |
| 11 |
> > > mask |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > >1.2.43 in package.mask? |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > Meanwhile I'm trying to fix firefox so I can read the bug report |
| 16 |
> > > mentioned by Andras. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > well I'm getting into a .la hell... |
| 19 |
> > you need to rebuild packages which are themselves not invalid and |
| 20 |
> > therefore can't be found by revdep-rebuild... |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > searching with "grep png12 `find /usr/lib64/ -name '*.la'`" lists all .la |
| 23 |
> > files with a bad png version, rebuilding those will fix the system. after |
| 24 |
> > that all packages found by revdep-rebuild can be emerged. |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > Rudmer |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> run la fixer |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
ah, yes I knew there was something easier 8-) |
| 31 |
well running `lafilefixer --justfixit` did not find anything so I got them all |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
thanks! |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Rudmer |
Archives