1 |
On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 09 May 2010, walt wrote: |
3 |
> > This looks to me like a major portage screwup. I see that on my ~amd64 |
4 |
> > machine I have both versions of libpng, but the 1.2.43-r1 doesn't install |
5 |
> > a pkg-config file because 1.4.2 installs one with the same name, and just |
6 |
> > as bad, version 1.2.43-r1 removed the libpng12 header files. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > For now, I'd suggest just going back to to 1.2.43 if you can -- maybe |
9 |
> > mask |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > >1.2.43 in package.mask? |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > Meanwhile I'm trying to fix firefox so I can read the bug report |
14 |
> > mentioned by Andras. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> well I'm getting into a .la hell... |
17 |
> you need to rebuild packages which are themselves not invalid and therefore |
18 |
> can't be found by revdep-rebuild... |
19 |
> |
20 |
> searching with "grep png12 `find /usr/lib64/ -name '*.la'`" lists all .la |
21 |
> files with a bad png version, rebuilding those will fix the system. after |
22 |
> that all packages found by revdep-rebuild can be emerged. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Rudmer |
25 |
|
26 |
run la fixer |
27 |
|
28 |
and op: |
29 |
deinstall libpng1.2 |
30 |
|
31 |
and walt: |
32 |
preserved libs. Look into it. |