| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:24 on Sunday 21 November 2010, Mick did |
| 2 |
opine thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sunday 21 November 2010 15:05:52 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 16:35 on Sunday 21 November 2010, Mick |
| 6 |
> > did |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > opine thusly: |
| 9 |
> > > On Sunday 21 November 2010 13:03:48 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 10 |
> > > > I think you are trying to use the ebuilds too soon. Maybe stick with |
| 11 |
> > > > efl a bit longer. |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > Thank you Alan, much appreciated. I'll stay with efl for now. It was |
| 14 |
> > > just that the statement of the dev in the link you posted, which |
| 15 |
> > > suggested we should have moved over to 'enlightenment' overlay by now, |
| 16 |
> > > that made me think I should get going on this. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > I thought the same at the time, but you've now shown that the dev's |
| 19 |
> > statement was likely premature |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> LOL! I think that the whole enchilada is borked at the moment: |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> # emerge -1aDv dev-libs/ecore dev-libs/e_dbus dev-libs/eet dev-libs/eina |
| 24 |
> dev- libs/embryo dev-libs/efreet media-libs/edje media-libs/ethumb |
| 25 |
> media-libs/evas x11-wm/enlightenment |
| 26 |
> enlightenment-base/e_module-notification enlightenment- |
| 27 |
> base/e_module-tclock net-libs/exchange app-text/epdf media-libs/emotion |
| 28 |
> dev- libs/eeze enlightenment-base/e_module-forecasts |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Calculating dependencies... done! |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "dev-libs/e_dbus" have been masked. |
| 35 |
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your |
| 36 |
> request: - dev-libs/e_dbus-1.0.0_beta2 (masked by: ~amd64 keyword) |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge |
| 40 |
> man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> However, I have this keyword set up: |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> =dev-libs/e_dbus-9999 ** |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> so I think that it *should* use the cvs and not complain!? |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> Perhaps I'll pass on updating my E17 and leave well alone for another week |
| 49 |
> or two until this transition has bedded in somewhat. |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
The only e_dbus ebuild available right now is 1.0.0_beta2 in the portage tree: |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
# eix e_dbus |
| 55 |
[D] dev-libs/e_dbus |
| 56 |
Available versions: (~)1.0.0_beta2 {bluetooth +connman doc +hal |
| 57 |
+libnotify nls ofono static-libs ukit} |
| 58 |
Installed versions: 9999[1](22:30:02 12/11/10)(bluetooth connman hal |
| 59 |
libnotify ofono ukit -doc -nls -static-libs) |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
emerge is not trying to use any of the overlays as they do not contain any |
| 63 |
e_dbus ebuilds. |
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
Yes, it is somewhat borked and a week's wait is a good idea |
| 66 |
-- |
| 67 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives