Re: [gentoo-user] Re: E17 and package.use

[Mick]

On Sunday 21 November 2010 15:05:52 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 16:35 on Sunday 21 November 2010, Mick did
>
> opine thusly:
> > On Sunday 21 November 2010 13:03:48 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > I think you are trying to use the ebuilds too soon. Maybe stick with
> > > efl a bit longer.
> >
> > Thank you Alan, much appreciated.  I'll stay with efl for now.  It was
> > just that the statement of the dev in the link you posted, which
> > suggested we should have moved over to 'enlightenment' overlay by now,
> > that made me think I should get going on this.
>
> I thought the same at the time, but you've now shown that the dev's
> statement was likely premature

LOL!  I think that the whole enchilada is borked at the moment:

# emerge -1aDv dev-libs/ecore dev-libs/e_dbus dev-libs/eet dev-libs/eina dev-
libs/embryo dev-libs/efreet media-libs/edje media-libs/ethumb media-libs/evas 
x11-wm/enlightenment enlightenment-base/e_module-notification enlightenment-
base/e_module-tclock net-libs/exchange app-text/epdf media-libs/emotion dev-
libs/eeze enlightenment-base/e_module-forecasts 

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!

!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "dev-libs/e_dbus" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- dev-libs/e_dbus-1.0.0_beta2 (masked by: ~amd64 keyword)


For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge
man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook.

However, I have this keyword set up:

=dev-libs/e_dbus-9999 **

so I think that it *should* use the cvs and not complain!?

Perhaps I'll pass on updating my E17 and leave well alone for another week or 
two until this transition has bedded in somewhat.
-- 
Regards,
Mick