1 |
On Monday 12 October 2009 11:11:06 Peter Humphrey wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 11 October 2009 22:23:11 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
> > > I knew how to do it but I thought it would return a lot of hits from |
4 |
> > > anything containing the letter "q". Later on when I had a little bit |
5 |
> > > of time to sit here, I tried it. It only returned the one result. |
6 |
> > > Still sort of surprised about that. I actually just ran equery b q . |
7 |
> > > Neato ! It has a microscope and read my mind. o_O |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > which doesn't accept regular expressions or wild-cards, it wants a |
10 |
> > literal value. The man page says it will return the path used if the |
11 |
> > exact argument is entered on the command line. So you can only get one |
12 |
> > answer |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Interesting. I tried it just out of interest and I got two: |
15 |
> |
16 |
> $ equery b q |
17 |
> [ Searching for file(s) q in *... ] |
18 |
> app-portage/portage-utils-0.1.29 (/usr/bin/q) |
19 |
> sys-libs/ncurses-5.6-r2 (/usr/share/terminfo/q) |
20 |
|
21 |
There's always someone willing to go look and find the exceptions :-) |
22 |
|
23 |
So your box just happens to have *two* files named "q" "-) |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |