| 1 |
On Tuesday 03 May 2011 09:12:04 Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 02 May 2011 21:18:00 Mick wrote: |
| 3 |
> > A bit O/T to the original post, but how does kompozer compares to |
| 4 |
> > Komodo-edit? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I was too terse a moment ago. I haven't seen Komodo-edit, but from the list |
| 7 |
> of features on Softpedia's site it seems to omit the one thing I use |
| 8 |
> Kompozer for: WYSIWYG style editing. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> It's extremely useful to be able to see the effect on a web page of a small |
| 11 |
> change in a style definition - the instant the change goes in. No |
| 12 |
> before-and- after comparisons, no unnoticed effects on other style |
| 13 |
> elements. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I see. Useful to know. With Komodo-edit you refresh the page in Firefox |
| 16 |
(it's inbuilt browser). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> For content editing I prefer BlueFish, but when I approached a site |
| 20 |
> redesign idea the other day I realised I'd be lost without Kompozer. It |
| 21 |
> really is that good. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> It does have bugs, but most of those can be evaded by following Greg |
| 24 |
> Tutor's tutorials on the web. It also needs a lot more development effort. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I'll keep an eye on it, to see when it makes it in stable. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Regards, |
| 30 |
Mick |
Archives