| 1 |
On Monday 02 May 2011 21:18:00 Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> A bit O/T to the original post, but how does kompozer compares to |
| 4 |
> Komodo-edit? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I was too terse a moment ago. I haven't seen Komodo-edit, but from the list of |
| 7 |
features on Softpedia's site it seems to omit the one thing I use Kompozer for: |
| 8 |
WYSIWYG style editing. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
It's extremely useful to be able to see the effect on a web page of a small |
| 11 |
change in a style definition - the instant the change goes in. No before-and- |
| 12 |
after comparisons, no unnoticed effects on other style elements. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
For content editing I prefer BlueFish, but when I approached a site redesign |
| 15 |
idea the other day I realised I'd be lost without Kompozer. It really is that |
| 16 |
good. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
It does have bugs, but most of those can be evaded by following Greg Tutor's |
| 19 |
tutorials on the web. It also needs a lot more development effort. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
HTH. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Rgds |
| 25 |
Peter |
Archives