1 |
2015-08-10 10:55 GMT+02:00 Mickaël Bucas <mbucas@×××××.com>: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> 2015-08-10 2:15 GMT+02:00 Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Howdy, |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > I'm sure I'm not alone on monitoring -dev to see upcoming changes. I |
9 |
> > noticed they switched to git or something and it seems to have caused a |
10 |
> > bit of trouble. At least I think it may have. I did my usual 'eix-sync |
11 |
> > && emerge -uvaDN world'. The sync took MUCH longer than usual. I'm |
12 |
> > talking a WHOLE LOT longer than usual. My first thought, one time thing |
13 |
> > because of the changes, maybe. Then I got a screen full of this sort of |
14 |
> > stuff. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > * Missing digest for |
19 |
> > |
20 |
'/var/cache/portage/tree/media-libs/fontconfig/fontconfig-2.11.1-r2.ebuild' |
21 |
> [...] |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I got a similar list about all my installed packages. The reason is that |
24 |
the Manifest files have changed. |
25 |
> Before there was a digest for each ebuild in a category, as can be seen |
26 |
here : |
27 |
> |
28 |
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo-portage-rsync-mirror/blob/master/kde-base/knotes/Manifest |
29 |
> Now there is only the digests for source files |
30 |
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/kde-base/knotes/Manifest |
31 |
> |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> > Can I take that "just saying" above back and say FUBAR instead? :-( |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > Thoughts?? |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> > Dale |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Either the Manifest generator encountered a problem, or the digest for |
40 |
ebuilds is not necessary in new versions of portage, but the latter is less |
41 |
likely in my opinion as it would lower overall security. |
42 |
> I didn't find a bug about this subject, but I don't really know what and |
43 |
where to search... |
44 |
|
45 |
So the answer was in Git history, in the first commit : |
46 |
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/kde-base/knotes/Manifest?showmsg=1 |
47 |
|
48 |
"3. Transform all Manifests to thin" |
49 |
|
50 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Repository_format/package/Manifest |
51 |
"A Thin Manifest is a Manifest file in which checksums are stored only for |
52 |
distfiles (*DIST* type) and not for files inside the repository. The |
53 |
motivation for that is whenever the repository is fetched through a VCS |
54 |
which ensures local file integrity already." |
55 |
|
56 |
I think I understand the problem a bit better : the CVS repository |
57 |
contained classic Manifest files, and was exposed directly to rsync. The |
58 |
Git repository contains only thin Manifest, but has been set as the source |
59 |
for rsync at one point ! |
60 |
|
61 |
This has already been reported, and solved. |
62 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557184 |
63 |
|
64 |
Best regards |
65 |
Mickaël Bucas |