1 |
Mark Knecht wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 11:39 AM Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com |
5 |
> <mailto:rdalek1967@×××××.com>> wrote: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> <SNIP> |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > I suspect it has something to do with this being a older system. I |
10 |
> > wouldn't be surprised if the SATA was a older and slower version. I |
11 |
> > guess I could google it. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> You need to study your specs. Even the first version of SATA, SATA 1, |
14 |
> was capable of 150MB/S. SATA2 does 300MB/S. This is unlikely IMO |
15 |
> to be due to SATA specs. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Have you run iperf yet as I suggested? It will easily tell you what the |
18 |
> network performance is and takes 5 seconds in NGL. |
19 |
|
20 |
I ran it but it never returned anything. I let it sit for at least a |
21 |
minute but it just sat there. I don't have that command on my Gentoo |
22 |
rig. This is what it did on the NAS box. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
root@truenas[~]# iperf -s |
26 |
------------------------------------------------------------ |
27 |
Server listening on TCP port 5001 |
28 |
TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) |
29 |
------------------------------------------------------------ |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
And nothing. Several minutes later, still nothing. And it continues to |
33 |
sit there. I don't think it is working. :/ |
34 |
|
35 |
Still, odds are, whatever it is, I'm not likely going to be able to |
36 |
change it. That poor old CPU just may not have the needed instruction |
37 |
set to be really fast for this. Maybe a different encryption would be |
38 |
better. I dunno. It's temporary anyway. |
39 |
|
40 |
And still nothing. It's been sitting there since I read the last |
41 |
message. Still, nothing. |
42 |
|
43 |
Dale |
44 |
|
45 |
:-) :-) |