| 1 |
> -----Original Message----- |
| 2 |
> From: Dale [mailto:dalek1967@×××××××××.net] |
| 3 |
> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 12:18 AM |
| 4 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 5 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild command doesn't fix broken libs |
| 6 |
> it finds |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> Bob Young wrote: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
>> How do I determine if this is a case of "orphaned file, deep dependency, |
| 12 |
>> binary package or specially evaluated library" and, if it is one of |
| 13 |
>those, |
| 14 |
>> how do I determine which one, and then how do I fix this...? |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Thanks for listening, |
| 17 |
>> Bob Young |
| 18 |
>> San Jose, CA |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
This may help: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125728 I'm not |
| 23 |
sure what changed but mine does not do this any more. I'm using |
| 24 |
app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.3-r1 at the moment. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Dale |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
:-) :-) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Thanks Dale, |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
After a little thought and some investigation I'd already come up with the |
| 34 |
symlink solution on my own. However I do find it a little disturbing that |
| 35 |
this is exactly the same, as a bug that has a creation date of: 2006-03-10, |
| 36 |
nearly two years ago. I also know that I didn't have this problem until a |
| 37 |
recent new "stable" version of gcc was merged. That means somebody is |
| 38 |
re-introducing bugs that have already been fixed. Making such easily |
| 39 |
avoidable mistakes does not bode well... |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Thanks Again, |
| 42 |
Bob Young |
| 43 |
San Jose, CA. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives