| 1 |
Bob Young wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
>> -----Original Message----- |
| 4 |
>> From: Dale [mailto:dalek1967@×××××××××.net] |
| 5 |
>> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 12:18 AM |
| 6 |
>> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 7 |
>> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild command doesn't fix broken libs |
| 8 |
>> it finds |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>> Bob Young wrote: |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
>>> How do I determine if this is a case of "orphaned file, deep dependency, |
| 18 |
>>> binary package or specially evaluated library" and, if it is one of |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>> those, |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>>> how do I determine which one, and then how do I fix this...? |
| 23 |
>>> |
| 24 |
>>> Thanks for listening, |
| 25 |
>>> Bob Young |
| 26 |
>>> San Jose, CA |
| 27 |
>>> |
| 28 |
>>> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> This may help: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125728 I'm not |
| 32 |
> sure what changed but mine does not do this any more. I'm using |
| 33 |
> app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.3-r1 at the moment. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Dale |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> :-) :-) |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> Thanks Dale, |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> After a little thought and some investigation I'd already come up with the |
| 43 |
> symlink solution on my own. However I do find it a little disturbing that |
| 44 |
> this is exactly the same, as a bug that has a creation date of: 2006-03-10, |
| 45 |
> nearly two years ago. I also know that I didn't have this problem until a |
| 46 |
> recent new "stable" version of gcc was merged. That means somebody is |
| 47 |
> re-introducing bugs that have already been fixed. Making such easily |
| 48 |
> avoidable mistakes does not bode well... |
| 49 |
> |
| 50 |
> Thanks Again, |
| 51 |
> Bob Young |
| 52 |
> San Jose, CA. |
| 53 |
> |
| 54 |
> |
| 55 |
> |
| 56 |
> |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
It has been around for a while but I don't think it actually breaks |
| 59 |
anything. I have never had a problem with my system and it did that for |
| 60 |
ages. |
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
My workaround has always been to just oneshot everything but gcc and |
| 63 |
then rerun revdep-rebuild -i -p again to make sure the other problems |
| 64 |
were fixed. Of course, it would be good if it worked to begin with. |
| 65 |
Then again, I would rather a bug that breaks something be fixed first |
| 66 |
too. o_O |
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
I have gcc-4.1.2 installed here and I do not get that error. It is |
| 69 |
masked but no problems for me so far. Could it be that specific version |
| 70 |
of gcc you have maybe? Maybe someone else can chime in on what version |
| 71 |
they have and if they get that error or not. |
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
Glad to have helped. |
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
Dale |
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
:-) :-) :-) |
| 78 |
-- |
| 79 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives