| 1 |
On Wednesday 11 November 2015 23:08:44 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
>On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:18:15 +0100, Ralf wrote: |
| 3 |
>> And thinking about btrfs snapshot feature, using some 'btrfs history |
| 4 |
>> tool', i would probably only be able to see a lot of crypto garbage when |
| 5 |
>> going through my history (which can for sure be accessed by ecryptfs, |
| 6 |
>> but not by standard btrfs tools). |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>That's a good point, you'd need to mount each snapshot before you could |
| 9 |
>read it. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>I *really* wish btrfs had its own encryption, but I suspect this would be |
| 12 |
>far from trivia to implement. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
From a presentation [0] earlier this year I understand that Chris Mason really |
| 15 |
wants it, too, but has something else he wanted to finish first (I don't |
| 16 |
remember what, though). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3QRWUfBua8 |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Marc Joliet |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we |
| 24 |
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup |
Archives