| 1 |
pk wrote: |
| 2 |
> Iain Buchanan wrote: |
| 3 |
>> pk wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Hello, |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> [snip] |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>> Right now I have a GLSA warning on the european configured one: |
| 9 |
>>> 200808-12 [N] Postfix: local... |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> On the other one there is no GLSA warning, although both wants to |
| 12 |
>>> upgrade to postfix 2.5.5 |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> how did you run glsa-check? With 'affected', 'all', or 'new'? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> "glsa-check -l | grep -i '\[n\]'" |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
>>> This has been like this for about a week now. Does anyone know why |
| 19 |
>>> this difference occurs? I'm just curious... |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> Have you synced both machines again recently? glsa-check only updates |
| 22 |
>> it's information when you sync portage, so it could be that one rsync |
| 23 |
>> server had the advisory before the other one, and you just synced |
| 24 |
>> while they were different. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Well, just for the sake of it I tried it again (both machines are |
| 27 |
> sync'ed right now). The "european" shows the GLSA for Postfix. The other |
| 28 |
> one doesn't show anything. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> When I do "emerge --with-bdeps y -DupN world", Portage wishes to upgrade |
| 31 |
> both machines to Postfix-2.5.5. Strange... |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
OK, first lets see that both machines have the same advisory: |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
glsa-check -l | grep -i postfix |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
If so, perhaps the "non-affected" machine says [A] or [U]. Could you |
| 38 |
have already applied an update? Perhaps the update was in a pre 2.5.5 |
| 39 |
version of postfix that you applied to one machine only? |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
> Thanks for answering! |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
np! cya, |
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au> |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
There's something different about us -- different from people of Europe, |
| 48 |
Africa, Asia ... a deep and abiding belief in the Easter Bunny. |
| 49 |
-- G. Gordon Liddy |
Archives