| 1 |
Iain Buchanan wrote: |
| 2 |
> pk wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Hello, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> [snip] |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> Right now I have a GLSA warning on the european configured one: |
| 8 |
>> 200808-12 [N] Postfix: local... |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> On the other one there is no GLSA warning, although both wants to |
| 11 |
>> upgrade to postfix 2.5.5 |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> how did you run glsa-check? With 'affected', 'all', or 'new'? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
"glsa-check -l | grep -i '\[n\]'" |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
>> This has been like this for about a week now. Does anyone know why |
| 18 |
>> this difference occurs? I'm just curious... |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Have you synced both machines again recently? glsa-check only updates |
| 21 |
> it's information when you sync portage, so it could be that one rsync |
| 22 |
> server had the advisory before the other one, and you just synced while |
| 23 |
> they were different. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Well, just for the sake of it I tried it again (both machines are |
| 26 |
sync'ed right now). The "european" shows the GLSA for Postfix. The other |
| 27 |
one doesn't show anything. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
When I do "emerge --with-bdeps y -DupN world", Portage wishes to upgrade |
| 30 |
both machines to Postfix-2.5.5. Strange... |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Thanks for answering! |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Best regards |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Peter K |
Archives