1 |
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:03:20 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > More seriously, there is such a thing as a bad question, and they |
4 |
> > significantly outnumber the good. Most questions provide too little |
5 |
> > information to get a really useful answer. GIGO applies here as much |
6 |
> > as anywhere else. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> While I agree with you in general, I still think that most noise on |
9 |
> most mailing lists is due to bad answers, not questions. Answers tend |
10 |
> to get triggered by keywords without the answering folks reading the |
11 |
> whole question. |
12 |
|
13 |
That's a fair point, but there are also a lot of bad answers because the |
14 |
questions required too much guesswork to answer. |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Neil Bothwick |
19 |
|
20 |
Out of sorts? Heck, I'm out of *most* algorithms! |