1 |
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 01:10:14 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> One of the very first things you do with /usr at boot time is mount it, |
4 |
> and from then on you use it exactly as if it were always on / anyway. |
5 |
> I'll bet that since you moved all of portage out, your mount options and |
6 |
> fs configs are the same between the two anyway. So what exactly does a |
7 |
> separate /usr get you on a stabd-alone workstation buy you? |
8 |
|
9 |
If allows you to have /usr on a volume manager, LVM of ZFS, without the |
10 |
extra work of putting / on there. / doesn't really need to be on LVM/ZFS |
11 |
since its size is unlikely to change much. |
12 |
|
13 |
However, the main reason, IMO, for not putting root on the volume manager |
14 |
is to avoid the use of an initramfs. If it's going to require it anyway, |
15 |
you may as well use the initramfs to put / on the same managed volume |
16 |
as /usr. That's the route I took a while ago, using an initramfs to avoid |
17 |
having a separate /usr. |
18 |
|
19 |
On the eudev vs. udev point: Dale, if you read flameyes's blog post, |
20 |
you'll see that this isn't just about udev. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Neil Bothwick |
25 |
|
26 |
Windows Error #01: No error... ...yet. |