1 |
b.n. wrote: |
2 |
> Joerg Schilling ha scritto: |
3 |
>> "b.n." <brullonulla@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>> Joerg Schilling ha scritto: |
6 |
>>>> Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> |
9 |
>>>> Why do you continue to attack me? |
10 |
>>>> |
11 |
>>>> Do you really believe that this helps? |
12 |
>>> Repeat with me, Joerg. |
13 |
>>> "No one is attacking me." |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> Just because you did not read it to it's end does not meanthat he did |
16 |
>> not |
17 |
>> attack me. He write that "I am pissing him off". |
18 |
> |
19 |
> That's no attack Joerg. That's a statement about himself, not you. |
20 |
> If he said something like "Joerg is a moron" that would be a personal |
21 |
> attack. No one is saying that (at least, not me, nor him). He is |
22 |
> simply stating, instead, that your behaviour makes him feel nervous, |
23 |
> which is something different from attack. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Please, please, please: stop *always* assuming bad faith from anyone |
26 |
> that is not immediately agreeing with you. We asked this before and we |
27 |
> ask this again, and we will ask it until it happens. Please. That's |
28 |
> the *main* block to be surpassed if we want this to be a reasonable |
29 |
> thread |
30 |
> |
31 |
> (The other is your admittedly elusive attitude to release fully |
32 |
> details on what happened, both on your webpages and this thread -for |
33 |
> example, we still have *no* link about the supposed attacks you |
34 |
> received *before* the relicensing, despite repeated requests for that). |
35 |
> |
36 |
> m. |
37 |
I think it is in here: |
38 |
|
39 |
http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/linux-dist.html |
40 |
|
41 |
specifically (quote): |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
In fact, this happened around y2004. I received a patch that was |
45 |
intended to add UTF-8 support to mkisofs. |
46 |
|
47 |
Unfortunately, the code quality of this patch was lousy. It |
48 |
tried to incorrectly initialize a structure and it handled only |
49 |
a few obvious cases. Many important issues with UTF-8 support |
50 |
have been completely ignored. As a result, I rejected this patch |
51 |
because I do care about code quality (I still need to be able to |
52 |
maintain the code in a few years). The people in the Linux |
53 |
distribution could have fixed the problems and created a useful |
54 |
solution but they did not do this. |
55 |
|
56 |
Now these people have been in trouble and needed an excuse for |
57 |
their behavior. They created the fairy tale that there is a |
58 |
license problem in cdrtools. They created a network of |
59 |
"cooperation" and supported some people which created a fork of |
60 |
cdrtools based on the fairy tale..... |
61 |
|
62 |
(end quote) |
63 |
|
64 |
regards |
65 |
|
66 |
Mark |
67 |
|
68 |
|
69 |
-- |
70 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |