| 1 |
On 2014-09-21, Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On 2014-09-20, Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>>> The only Linux systems where I care about boot time are embedded |
| 8 |
>>>> systems which are never going to have the resources needed to run |
| 9 |
>>>> systemd. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> You are mistaken. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> No, I am not. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>>> I've helped a friend debug problems on a couple devices running a |
| 16 |
>>> custom Arch system with systemd. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> How does that contradict the statement I made that the systems where |
| 19 |
>> I care about boot times do not have the resources required to run |
| 20 |
>> systemd? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> You made a generic, catch-all statement about embedded systems which isnt |
| 23 |
> necessarily true. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
No, I made a statement about the systems where _I_ care about boot |
| 26 |
time. The embedded systems where I care about boot time are two |
| 27 |
industrial product lines where which I'm reponsible for the embedded |
| 28 |
Linux OS. Boot time matters for those products. Those products don't |
| 29 |
have a few extra MB to run systemd. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> There are plenty of routers or NAS devices or ipcams, etc that have |
| 32 |
> the resources to run systemd. Pretty much everything that has the |
| 33 |
> space to fit the kernel and a a few MB has the resources to run it |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I don't care about boot times for routers, NAS devices, ipcams, etc. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
The embedded systems where I care about boot time do _not_ have a few |
| 38 |
extra MB to run systemd. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I am covered with |
| 42 |
at pure vegetable oil and I am |
| 43 |
gmail.com writing a best seller! |
Archives