| 1 |
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:08:51 -0700 |
| 2 |
kashani <kashani-list@××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Enrico Weigelt schrieb: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> >> what network filesystem would you suggest for an small LAN ? |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > NFS. If Windows systems need to access the resources, I'd think |
| 10 |
> > about installing MS SFU on those boxes. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I spent a week fighting with SFU on 2003 last month. While I'm sure I |
| 14 |
> missed a number of things and did a few things wrong it was far simpler |
| 15 |
> to run NFS for the Linux boxes and Samba for the Windows boxes on the |
| 16 |
> main storage head rather than trying to get Windows to play nicely with |
| 17 |
> NFS. YMMV. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> On the original question a dedicated NFS server sounds like a solution |
| 20 |
> rather than chaining NFS through multiple machines. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I wasted days getting NFS to not work. I switched to CIFS. It is working very well. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives