| 1 |
On 2012-12-24, Bruce Hill wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Nuno J. Silva wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Now, also, from my understanding, this was already the case for some |
| 6 |
>> time (maybe even years?). And that's why I've asked for more details. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> So, if the udev you use is OK with no initrd, what is in the new udev |
| 9 |
>> that actually requires the initrd? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> "eselect news read" is yore freeeend ;) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> 2012-03-16-udev-181-unmasking |
| 14 |
> Title udev-181 unmasking |
| 15 |
> Author William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
| 16 |
> Posted 2012-03-16 |
| 17 |
> Revision 1 |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> udev-181 is being unmasked on 2012-03-19. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> This news item is to inform you that once you upgrade to a version of |
| 22 |
> udev >=181, if you have /usr on a separate partition, you must boot your |
| 23 |
> system with an initramfs which pre-mounts /usr. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> An initramfs which does this is created by |
| 26 |
>>=sys-kernel/genkernel-3.4.25.1 or |
| 27 |
>>=sys-kernel/dracut-017-r1. If you do not want to use these tools, be |
| 28 |
> sure any initramfs you create pre-mounts /usr. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Also, if you are using OpenRC, you must upgrade to >= openrc-0.9.9. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> For more information on why this has been done, see the following URL: |
| 33 |
> http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> You can read that systemd is *THE* problem, not udev, and that until the |
| 36 |
> primma donnas fubared udev by jamming systemd into it, There Was No Such |
| 37 |
> Problem (TM). |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> And that explains where the train jumped the track... |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
No, actually it doesn't. It just has the same kind of very generic claim |
| 42 |
that has been repeated several times in this thread (which is "why? |
| 43 |
because it won't work") and links to an article that explains why some |
| 44 |
udev rules would silently fail for all this time (for *years* now, I'd |
| 45 |
guess). |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
The article does not describe a change introduced with 181, it describes |
| 48 |
what already happened with previous versions. I am not using >= 181 and |
| 49 |
I do see the issues the article mentions (it does not break here because |
| 50 |
I do not have a separate /usr, but I can see some rules that use stuff |
| 51 |
from /usr). |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
-- |
| 54 |
Nuno Silva (aka njsg) |
| 55 |
http://njsg.sdf-eu.org/ |
Archives