1 |
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Nuno J. Silva wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Now, also, from my understanding, this was already the case for some |
4 |
> time (maybe even years?). And that's why I've asked for more details. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> So, if the udev you use is OK with no initrd, what is in the new udev |
7 |
> that actually requires the initrd? |
8 |
|
9 |
"eselect news read" is yore freeeend ;) |
10 |
|
11 |
2012-03-16-udev-181-unmasking |
12 |
Title udev-181 unmasking |
13 |
Author William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
14 |
Posted 2012-03-16 |
15 |
Revision 1 |
16 |
|
17 |
udev-181 is being unmasked on 2012-03-19. |
18 |
|
19 |
This news item is to inform you that once you upgrade to a version of |
20 |
udev >=181, if you have /usr on a separate partition, you must boot your |
21 |
system with an initramfs which pre-mounts /usr. |
22 |
|
23 |
An initramfs which does this is created by |
24 |
>=sys-kernel/genkernel-3.4.25.1 or |
25 |
>=sys-kernel/dracut-017-r1. If you do not want to use these tools, be |
26 |
sure any initramfs you create pre-mounts /usr. |
27 |
|
28 |
Also, if you are using OpenRC, you must upgrade to >= openrc-0.9.9. |
29 |
|
30 |
For more information on why this has been done, see the following URL: |
31 |
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken |
32 |
|
33 |
You can read that systemd is *THE* problem, not udev, and that until the |
34 |
primma donnas fubared udev by jamming systemd into it, There Was No Such |
35 |
Problem (TM). |
36 |
|
37 |
And that explains where the train jumped the track... |
38 |
-- |
39 |
Happy Penguin Computers >') |
40 |
126 Fenco Drive ( \ |
41 |
Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ |
42 |
support@×××××××××××××××××××××.com |
43 |
662-269-2706 662-205-6424 |
44 |
http://happypenguincomputers.com/ |
45 |
|
46 |
Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting |