| 1 |
James Broadhead wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 16 November 2011 08:55, Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Raffaele BELARDI wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 11/16/2011 09:23 AM, Dale wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>>> Maybe check if there is a BIOS update available? Might be worth a shot. |
| 7 |
>>> I already upgraded the BIOS to have the dual-core CPU recognized, |
| 8 |
>>> otherwise the kernel would not even start. There is yet another update |
| 9 |
>>> on the ASUS site but it's mainly for AM3 processor compatibility and |
| 10 |
>>> labelled as 'beta' so I'm a bit nervous to try it ;-) |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>> I have a beta for mine too. It'll will be there when it gets marked stable |
| 13 |
>> tho. I'm in no hurry. Sometimes waiting is a good idea. |
| 14 |
> The latest version of my Gigabyte BIOS has been 'in beta' for about 4 |
| 15 |
> years now -- _and_ it's the version where they add support for |
| 16 |
> Quad-Core 2s! |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Sometimes it means that they added some features, but can't be |
| 19 |
> bothered doing a full test suite. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Mine has been there for quite a while too. According to the timestamps |
| 24 |
on mine, it was downloaded back in August. Hmmmm, glad mine is working |
| 25 |
as is. lol |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Dale |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
:-) :-) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives