1 |
On 04/01/13 17:09, Mick wrote: |
2 |
> On Friday 04 Jan 2013 04:13:21 Randy Barlow wrote: |
3 |
>> On 01/03/2013 12:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
4 |
>>> Does anyone recommend a mail client that doesn't rely too heavily on the |
5 |
>>> mouse? I much prefer to navigate, reply etc with the keyboard. I've |
6 |
>>> seen Evolution recommended; is that OK? |
7 |
>> Thunderbird is my favorite mail client. You can do a lot with the KB. |
8 |
>> For example, go to next read mail is just 'n' for next. CTRL-R for |
9 |
>> reply. It's not bad to learn the shortcuts. Plus it has a lot of great |
10 |
>> features and extensions. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> For CLI clients, I sometimes use Mutt. It's a little bit of a pain to |
13 |
>> configure for IMAP, but once you get it going it's pretty cool. |
14 |
> Can mutt be made to use autocompletion for email addresses and to |
15 |
> automatically select encryption keys (gpg and/or s/mime)? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Last time I tried it briefly this became a sticking point for me ... |
18 |
Apologies for breaking the proper threading, if indeed I have. |
19 |
|
20 |
I've got Thunderbird to connect to my ISP and fetch new messages, but I |
21 |
now have another, large problem. It won't import my 25,000 or so |
22 |
messages from kmail, nor even its filters. I do not wish to lose all |
23 |
that history, so can anyone suggest another e-mail client that can |
24 |
reliably import messages and filters from kmail? |
25 |
|
26 |
Alternatively, since kmail version 1 has disappeared from the current |
27 |
mirrors, does it live in an overlay somewhere so that I can get the old, |
28 |
solid behaviour back? I assume that if I do regress to the old version |
29 |
I'll lose everything that's come in since the "upgrade" (it's a POP3 |
30 |
server). |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Peter. |