| 1 |
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 12:47:46 David Relson wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I've been running unstable versions of portage for many months and |
| 4 |
> currently have 2.1.7.17, which _is_ the newest non-masked version. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Nevertheless, it isn't the latest version. To get that you need an entry in |
| 7 |
package.unmask; then portage will be able to sort out far more complex |
| 8 |
problems than the unmasked version can. Don't worry - many people here have |
| 9 |
been doing this for many months, with no problems attributable to portage. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-- |
| 12 |
Rgds |
| 13 |
Peter. |
Archives