| 1 |
On 21/10/13 08:31, Daniel Campbell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/20/2013 09:34 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 05:03:51PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>>> That's a bridge we will cross when there is a bridge to be crossed, but |
| 6 |
>>> from top of my head: |
| 7 |
>>> We will maintain a minimal patchset that reverts the offending code. |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> As in, that's nothing to be worried about before it happens. |
| 10 |
>> That's not always possible, e.g. GNOME 3.8. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> I think that's an exception to the rule. I mean, upstream deliberately |
| 13 |
> chose to depend on systemd/logind and whatnot. In such a situation |
| 14 |
> there's literally no way to fix it without a fork, and I doubt Gentoo as |
| 15 |
> an organization is interested in that. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
well said |
Archives