1 |
Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Grant wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>Thanks Peter. That is quite contrary to what most of the other posts |
6 |
>>in this thread are saying. Those are all just rumors and myths? |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>>- Grant |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I think we all know it can be done. |
15 |
|
16 |
No, we don't. |
17 |
|
18 |
> Governments do it all the time. |
19 |
> Data recevery people do it too. |
20 |
|
21 |
Do they? Why don't they advertise this? |
22 |
|
23 |
> Years ago I worked at a computer place |
24 |
> and the hard drive crashed. The heads physically pulled up the magnetic |
25 |
> media in a couple places. They still got almost 80% of the data back. |
26 |
|
27 |
AGAIN: That's a died hard disk. That's *COMPLETELY* different |
28 |
matter. And if you read what he wrote, you'll find that he |
29 |
also said that recovering data from died hardware is possible. |
30 |
|
31 |
> I'm sure the NSA, CIA and a few others can get data back off just about |
32 |
> anything. It's just a matter of how much money you want to spend and |
33 |
> how much time you want to put into it. |
34 |
|
35 |
Interesting point, though - if your data is worth just a |
36 |
few thousand bucks, than it will most of the time not make |
37 |
sense to waste the money on it. |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
Alexander Skwar |
41 |
-- |
42 |
I owe the government $3400 in taxes. So I sent them two hammers and a |
43 |
toilet seat. |
44 |
-- Michael McShane |
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |