1 |
At Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:58:30 +0200 Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Rightee-o boys and girls, this is the point where the pretty girl from candid |
4 |
> camera reveals that you are all suckers and points to the hidden camera |
5 |
> behind the mirror: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Am I the only one here that sees this is a stupid and completely irrelevant |
8 |
> thread? HTML mail is like farting when you meet the Queen - you just don't do |
9 |
> it. There isn't a rule about it, it's not an exam question and there never |
10 |
> was a formal process that came up with it. But if you do start raising one |
11 |
> cheek to split the crack and let rip, the butler might come along nicely and |
12 |
> ask you not to. At which point you should say "um, gee, thanks, I didn't know |
13 |
> that..." |
14 |
|
15 |
I think that is a little harsh. I dislike html mail, never send it, |
16 |
and know perfectly well that this group is for text, bottom-posted mail. |
17 |
|
18 |
I don't have a proposal for how a new user should find out, but I don't |
19 |
think we should act as though a major offense was committed. If after |
20 |
being asked to send text only, a user insists on sending html, one could |
21 |
then complain loudly (or simply ignore the mail or update your |
22 |
kill-file). |
23 |
|
24 |
allan |