| 1 |
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 04:28, Collins Richey wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm just curious. The last time I participated in a -O2 vs. -Os |
| 3 |
> discussion was 1 -1/2 to 2 years ago. There were certain software |
| 4 |
> components (don't remember which) where -Os was contraindicated - |
| 5 |
> warnings against compiling them with -Os. Have things progressed to |
| 6 |
> the point where -Os can be generally recommended? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Though I haven't used it myself so far (I'm using -O2) I think it has in the |
| 9 |
sense that most programs in the Gentoo tree that are sensible to this (e.g. |
| 10 |
openoffice, kdelibs and xorg-x11) are replacing -Os by -O2 in the ebuilds. If |
| 11 |
you experience a problem with a program in the Gentoo tree because of -Os you |
| 12 |
should be filing a bug to get it fixed... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Bo Andresen |
Archives