From: | Tom H <tomh0665@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Gentoo User <gentoo-user@l.g.o> | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 & Youtube... Audio: No | ||
Date: | Thu, 22 Dec 2016 06:56:25 | ||
Message-Id: | CAOdo=SyExMyaAfa9yiKsXW9X8z4zJqXPEcLqU9_-kAs-6GTw2A@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 & Youtube... Audio: No by lee |
1 | On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 5:04 PM, lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
2 | > Andrej Rode <mail@××××××××.de> writes: |
3 | >> |
4 | >>> Or can you explain how unrecognisable names make things easier? |
5 | >> |
6 | >> Yeah they make life easier. From your talk you never had a problem |
7 | >> with eth<0,10> switching names after boot. Everyone who had them |
8 | >> appreciates predictable network interfaces. |
9 | > |
10 | > Right, I've never had a problem like that. |
11 | |
12 | Therefore no one else could possibly have had it... |