| 1 |
On 01/27/2014 10:48 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:57:10 +0100, hasufell wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> If it's about performance (in the sense of speed), then paludis |
| 5 |
>> is worse, because dependency calculation is more complex/complete |
| 6 |
>> there. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> That makes no sense at all. Paludis is written in a different |
| 9 |
> language using different algorithms. It's not about the amount of |
| 10 |
> work it does so much as how efficiently it does it. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That's exactly what I was saying. I was talking about speed, not |
| 15 |
efficiency. |
Archives